Causal Reasoning and Belief Perseverance
نویسنده
چکیده
Craig A. Anderson, University of Missouri, Columbia ,i t t f'. f i , ~ ~ In 1980 my wife and I moved to Houston. In those days Houston was "boomtown." While the rest of the country was mired in an economic recession of disastrous proportions. Houston's economy was growing by leaps and bounds. In the auto industry states, particularly Michigan. Houston newspapers were in great demand. not for the quality of their reporting or their features, but for the thickness of their want ads. The ensuing migration from the so-called rust belt to Houston produced unprecedented strains on a variety of social, economic, bureautic, and physical systems of the city. Traffic problems outstripped those of the Los Angeles area. City and county services were completeIyoverwhelmed. Nothing could be done without long waits in lines. For example, I stood outside a house trailor, which was being used as a county courthouse, for over 2 hours in 980 + weather in order to get Texas plates for my car. My problems were trivial, though, compared to those experienced by the masses of unemployed seeking work and shelter. Many families camped out in parks. Others lived under highway overpasses. Still others lived in their rusted out cars. The quality of life had declined dramatically in just a few years. As you might guess, the local residents were not happy. The salient cause was all those damnYankees (one word). A strong and negative stereotype developed about outsiders. and was applied to anyone with out-of-state plates on their car. The stereotype included origin (Michigan), economic circumstances (unemployed), attributions about economic circumstances (stupid. lazy), and personality characteristics (pushy, obnoxious. rude, aggressive). As you might guess, this stereotype produced a number of interesting behaviors. Of most interest to me was the obvious way such beliefs produced behaviors that guaranteed responsive behaviors that confumed the beliefs. One popular game played by the locals was to run cars with out-of-state plates off the highway. This was especially popular among the good old boys with pick-up trucks. This produced a classic defensive competion response (Kelley & Stlhelski., 1970) by the newcomers; you had to learn to identify potential attackers and how to cut them off before they got in an attacking position. Another consequence took place at a more personallevel. It was extremely difficult to make friends with neighbors if they were long time residents. My wife and I had just moved from California. Our car still had Indiana plates on iL Nonetheless, several of our neighbors greeted ,usby saying~ "I hear you're from Michigan." One neighbor in particular had used the stereotype about newcomers to generate particularly negative and perseverant beliefs about us. No matter how good we were as neighbors. his beliefs did not " ,~ ,
منابع مشابه
The Role of Circadian Variations and Socially Distributed Thinking in Belief Perseverance
From the moment they make up their mind, people are reluctant to change it. We tested the hypothesis that people disposing of more cognitive resources—through circadian variations or socially distributed thinking—would engage in deliberative thinking and would consequently be less likely to exhibit belief perseverance. Perseverance was measured by the change in judgments related to a suspect in...
متن کاملCausal and Plausible Reasoning in Expert Systems
This study sets out to establish a unified framework for causal and plausible reasoning. We identify a primitive set of causal roles which a condition may play in the inference. We also extend Dempster-Shafer theory to compose the belief in conclusion by the belief in rules and the belief in conditions. The combined framework permits us to express and propagate a scale of belief certainties in ...
متن کاملWhen Is Genetic Reasoning Not Fallacious?
Attempts to evaluate a belief or argument on the basis of its cause or origin are usually condemned as committing the genetic fallacy. However, I sketch a number of cases in which causal or historical factors are logically relevant to evaluating a belief, including an interesting abductive form that reasons from the best explanation for the existence of a belief to its likely truth. Such argume...
متن کاملOn Explanatory Belief revision systems: Initiation Grant Proposal
In this project, a newmodel for belief revision based on abduction will be elaborated within the framework of AGM belief revision. We construe “abduction” as the process of reasoning in which explanatory (causal) hypothesis are formed and evaluated. Our basic hypothesis is that agent seeks explanation, before she accepts and integate the new evidential information with the old. As a result, it ...
متن کاملThe Role of Causal Schemas in Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning allows us to go beyond the target hypothesis and capitalize on prior knowledge. Past research has shown that both the similarity of categories and specific knowledge about causal relations affect inductive plausibility. We go one step further and focus on the role of abstract causal schemas about main effects and interactions. Two experiments show that both prior assumptions...
متن کاملA dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning.
In three experiments, we examined how reasoners' preexisting beliefs about causal relations constrained their evaluation of covariation-based empirical evidence. Reasoners were presented with causal candidates that were a priori rated to be either believable or unbelievable, as well as information regarding the degree to which the cause and the effect covaried. Several findings supported the co...
متن کامل